Editor Resources
Guidance and tools for editors managing ecology submissions.
Journal at a Glance
ISSN: 2637-6075
DOI Prefix: 10.14302/issn.2637-6075
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer reviewed open access journal
Scope Alignment
Plant ecology, animal ecology, community dynamics, biodiversity, conservation biology, ecosystem function, and human environmental interactions. We prioritize field validated studies.
Publishing Model
Open access, single blind peer review, and rapid publication after acceptance and production checks. Metadata validation and DOI registration are included.
JPAE provides editors with structured guidance, templates, and workflow tools to support consistent and fair peer review decisions. Resources are designed to streamline evaluation of ecology manuscripts.
Decision Templates
Standardized decision letters and reviewer prompts.
Ethics Checklists
Support compliance with research integrity standards.
Reviewer Guidance
Criteria for evaluating ecological methods.
Data Review
Guidance for assessing data and code availability.
- Match reviewers to specific methodological expertise
- Encourage transparent reporting of field methods
- Request clarification on site selection and outcomes
- Promote reproducible and conservation relevant analyses
Editors can contact the editorial office for guidance on complex submissions or conflicts of interest. Email [email protected] for support.
- Confirm reviewer expertise aligns with plant and animal ecology.
- Request additional statistical review when complex models are used.
- Ensure reviewer feedback addresses data quality and ecological relevance.
- Encourage authors to clarify site selection and sampling design.
- Check that data availability statements are complete and accurate.
- Monitor review timelines and send reminders as needed.
- Assess whether conclusions match the evidence presented.
- Flag potential ethical concerns or conflicts promptly.
- Recommend revisions for unclear field protocols.
- Verify that code or pipeline documentation is adequate.
- Promote balanced reviewer feedback and avoid bias.
- Encourage transparency in reporting limitations.
- Use standard decision templates to maintain consistency.
- Check for compliance with journal formatting requirements.
- Ensure revisions address reviewer comments comprehensively.
- Escalate cases of suspected plagiarism or data issues.
- Document decision rationale in the editorial system.
- Provide authors with clear, actionable decision letters.
- Encourage reviewers to comment on habitat classification accuracy.
- Confirm that reviewer recommendations align with journal scope.
- Encourage clear summary statements in editorial decisions.
- Verify that conservation implications are supported by the data presented.
- Encourage authors to clarify monitoring duration and temporal coverage.
- Flag submissions lacking permit documentation or ethical approvals.
JPAE is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in plant and animal ecology. We emphasize reproducible field methods, clear reporting of ecological context, and ethical compliance across all article types.
The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].
We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in ecological research and conservation science.
Need Editorial Support?
Reach out for resources or assistance with manuscript handling.