Instructions for Author
Practical guidance for preparing a submission to Women's Reproductive Health (JWRH).
Prepare a manuscript that is clear, rigorous, and ready for peer review
Women's Reproductive Health publishes high quality work in obstetrics, gynecology, maternal health, fertility care, reproductive endocrinology, and sexual health. Following these guidelines helps editors and reviewers assess your work quickly and fairly.
We value transparency, reproducibility, and clinical or practical relevance. Please read each section carefully before submission.
Original Research
- Full length studies with clear objectives and validated methods
- Structured abstract and detailed results section
- Appropriate statistical analysis and limitations
- Data and materials availability statement
Review Articles
- Systematic, scoping, or narrative reviews with explicit methods
- Transparent search strategy and selection criteria
- Critical appraisal and synthesis of evidence
- Future research directions and practical implications
Brief Reports
- Focused findings that are novel and time sensitive
- Concise methods and results
- Clear statement of relevance to the field
- Suitable for pilot studies or technical notes
- Title page with author names, affiliations, corresponding author contact, and funding details.
- Abstract that summarizes background, methods, results, and conclusions with 3 to 6 keywords.
- Introduction that defines the problem, gap in knowledge, and study objectives.
- Methods section with study design, participants or materials, procedures, and analysis plan.
- Results section with clear tables or figures and transparent reporting of outcomes.
- Discussion that interprets findings, notes limitations, and explains real world implications.
- Acknowledgments, conflicts of interest, and data availability statements where applicable.
Human and animal research
Include ethics approval details, consent procedures, and protocol numbers. Describe how participant privacy is protected.
Clinical trials
Register trials in a recognized registry before enrollment and include the registration ID in the manuscript.
Data transparency
Provide a data availability statement and share datasets in trusted repositories when feasible.
Conflicts of interest
Disclose financial relationships, competing interests, and funder roles in study design or analysis.
Submit your manuscript
Select ManuscriptZone for full tracking, or use the Simple Manuscript Submission Form for a fast start. Both pathways follow the same review standards.
This page is designed to help authors and institutional partners plan publication early, reduce administrative delays, and align submissions with journal scope. Clear expectations improve review efficiency and help the editorial team deliver timely decisions.
As a senior publishing program, we focus on quality signals that matter to readers: methodological transparency, ethical compliance, and evidence that can be reproduced or translated. These standards strengthen both author reputation and journal credibility.
Our editorial office prioritizes responsive communication. Authors receive clear instructions, structured feedback, and guidance on revisions so that each submission has the best chance to succeed on its merits.
Open access publishing extends the life of research by enabling immediate use in teaching, clinical pathways, policy planning, and future studies. This value is amplified when metadata and data availability are treated as first class outputs.
We encourage authors to think beyond a single article. Submissions that include reusable datasets, detailed protocols, or software resources tend to attract broader readership and stronger citations over time.
If you are unsure about fit, reach out early. A short abstract review can prevent misalignment and help you target the strongest journal for your work.
This page is designed to help authors and institutional partners plan publication early, reduce administrative delays, and align submissions with journal scope. Clear expectations improve review efficiency and help the editorial team deliver timely decisions.
As a senior publishing program, we focus on quality signals that matter to readers: methodological transparency, ethical compliance, and evidence that can be reproduced or translated. These standards strengthen both author reputation and journal credibility.
Our editorial office prioritizes responsive communication. Authors receive clear instructions, structured feedback, and guidance on revisions so that each submission has the best chance to succeed on its merits.
Open access publishing extends the life of research by enabling immediate use in teaching, clinical pathways, policy planning, and future studies. This value is amplified when metadata and data availability are treated as first class outputs.
We encourage authors to think beyond a single article. Submissions that include reusable datasets, detailed protocols, or software resources tend to attract broader readership and stronger citations over time.
If you are unsure about fit, reach out early. A short abstract review can prevent misalignment and help you target the strongest journal for your work.
This page is designed to help authors and institutional partners plan publication early, reduce administrative delays, and align submissions with journal scope. Clear expectations improve review efficiency and help the editorial team deliver timely decisions.
As a senior publishing program, we focus on quality signals that matter to readers: methodological transparency, ethical compliance, and evidence that can be reproduced or translated. These standards strengthen both author reputation and journal credibility.
Our editorial office prioritizes responsive communication. Authors receive clear instructions, structured feedback, and guidance on revisions so that each submission has the best chance to succeed on its merits.
Open access publishing extends the life of research by enabling immediate use in teaching, clinical pathways, policy planning, and future studies. This value is amplified when metadata and data availability are treated as first class outputs.
We encourage authors to think beyond a single article. Submissions that include reusable datasets, detailed protocols, or software resources tend to attract broader readership and stronger citations over time.
If you are unsure about fit, reach out early. A short abstract review can prevent misalignment and help you target the strongest journal for your work.
This page is designed to help authors and institutional partners plan publication early, reduce administrative delays, and align submissions with journal scope. Clear expectations improve review efficiency and help the editorial team deliver timely decisions.
As a senior publishing program, we focus on quality signals that matter to readers: methodological transparency, ethical compliance, and evidence that can be reproduced or translated. These standards strengthen both author reputation and journal credibility.
Our editorial office prioritizes responsive communication. Authors receive clear instructions, structured feedback, and guidance on revisions so that each submission has the best chance to succeed on its merits.
Open access publishing extends the life of research by enabling immediate use in teaching, clinical pathways, policy planning, and future studies. This value is amplified when metadata and data availability are treated as first class outputs.
We encourage authors to think beyond a single article. Submissions that include reusable datasets, detailed protocols, or software resources tend to attract broader readership and stronger citations over time.
If you are unsure about fit, reach out early. A short abstract review can prevent misalignment and help you target the strongest journal for your work.
This page is designed to help authors and institutional partners plan publication early, reduce administrative delays, and align submissions with journal scope. Clear expectations improve review efficiency and help the editorial team deliver timely decisions.
As a senior publishing program, we focus on quality signals that matter to readers: methodological transparency, ethical compliance, and evidence that can be reproduced or translated. These standards strengthen both author reputation and journal credibility.
Our editorial office prioritizes responsive communication. Authors receive clear instructions, structured feedback, and guidance on revisions so that each submission has the best chance to succeed on its merits.
Open access publishing extends the life of research by enabling immediate use in teaching, clinical pathways, policy planning, and future studies. This value is amplified when metadata and data availability are treated as first class outputs.
We encourage authors to think beyond a single article. Submissions that include reusable datasets, detailed protocols, or software resources tend to attract broader readership and stronger citations over time.
If you are unsure about fit, reach out early. A short abstract review can prevent misalignment and help you target the strongest journal for your work.
This page is designed to help authors and institutional partners plan publication early, reduce administrative delays, and align submissions with journal scope. Clear expectations improve review efficiency and help the editorial team deliver timely decisions.
As a senior publishing program, we focus on quality signals that matter to readers: methodological transparency, ethical compliance, and evidence that can be reproduced or translated. These standards strengthen both author reputation and journal credibility.
Our editorial office prioritizes responsive communication. Authors receive clear instructions, structured feedback, and guidance on revisions so that each submission has the best chance to succeed on its merits.
Open access publishing extends the life of research by enabling immediate use in teaching, clinical pathways, policy planning, and future studies. This value is amplified when metadata and data availability are treated as first class outputs.
