Journal of Women's Reproductive Health

Journal of Women's Reproductive Health

Journal of Women's Reproductive Health – Article Processing Charges

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript

Article Processing Charges

Transparent open access fees for Women's Reproductive Health (JWRH).

Open access supported by transparent APCs

Women's Reproductive Health publishes peer reviewed scholarship in obstetrics, gynecology, maternal health, fertility care, reproductive endocrinology, and sexual health. Article processing charges (APCs) fund the editorial, production, and preservation services that keep every article immediately available to readers worldwide.

Our approach is simple: clear pricing, accountable services, and a publishing workflow that respects author time while maintaining rigorous quality controls.

What the APC supports

Editorial assessment

Scope checks, ethics screening, and assignment to expert editors and reviewers who evaluate scientific rigor and relevance.

Production quality

Professional copyediting, layout, figure preparation guidance, and publishing formats optimized for web and indexing.

Visibility and metadata

Structured metadata, persistent identifiers, and discoverability features that improve citation and reuse.

Long term preservation

Archiving and preservation workflows that ensure articles remain accessible and citable over time.

Pricing transparency and timing

APC details are provided early in the submission process and confirmed before any author commitment. Charges may vary by article type or service level, and any applicable adjustments are communicated in writing.

We encourage authors to plan APC coverage through grants, institutional publishing funds, or sponsor support, and we provide documentation to streamline approvals.

Discounts and waivers
  • Institutional agreements or consortia may reduce APCs for eligible authors.
  • Editorial board members, peer reviewers, or active contributors may be considered for recognition discounts.
  • Early career researchers or authors in resource constrained settings may request partial waivers.
  • Special issue initiatives may include limited time APC support to broaden participation.
  • Funding agencies often permit APC budgeting; we supply the language and documentation required for compliance.

For the current APC schedule, discount eligibility, or institutional support options, contact [email protected] and include your manuscript title and corresponding author details.

Submit your manuscript to an open access audience

Share your work with clinicians, researchers, and innovators who rely on immediate access to evidence in this field.

APC Guidance

This page is designed to help authors and institutional partners plan publication early, reduce administrative delays, and align submissions with journal scope. Clear expectations improve review efficiency and help the editorial team deliver timely decisions.

As a senior publishing program, we focus on quality signals that matter to readers: methodological transparency, ethical compliance, and evidence that can be reproduced or translated. These standards strengthen both author reputation and journal credibility.

Our editorial office prioritizes responsive communication. Authors receive clear instructions, structured feedback, and guidance on revisions so that each submission has the best chance to succeed on its merits.

Open access publishing extends the life of research by enabling immediate use in teaching, clinical pathways, policy planning, and future studies. This value is amplified when metadata and data availability are treated as first class outputs.

We encourage authors to think beyond a single article. Submissions that include reusable datasets, detailed protocols, or software resources tend to attract broader readership and stronger citations over time.

If you are unsure about fit, reach out early. A short abstract review can prevent misalignment and help you target the strongest journal for your work.

This page is designed to help authors and institutional partners plan publication early, reduce administrative delays, and align submissions with journal scope. Clear expectations improve review efficiency and help the editorial team deliver timely decisions.

As a senior publishing program, we focus on quality signals that matter to readers: methodological transparency, ethical compliance, and evidence that can be reproduced or translated. These standards strengthen both author reputation and journal credibility.

Our editorial office prioritizes responsive communication. Authors receive clear instructions, structured feedback, and guidance on revisions so that each submission has the best chance to succeed on its merits.

Open access publishing extends the life of research by enabling immediate use in teaching, clinical pathways, policy planning, and future studies. This value is amplified when metadata and data availability are treated as first class outputs.

We encourage authors to think beyond a single article. Submissions that include reusable datasets, detailed protocols, or software resources tend to attract broader readership and stronger citations over time.

If you are unsure about fit, reach out early. A short abstract review can prevent misalignment and help you target the strongest journal for your work.

This page is designed to help authors and institutional partners plan publication early, reduce administrative delays, and align submissions with journal scope. Clear expectations improve review efficiency and help the editorial team deliver timely decisions.

As a senior publishing program, we focus on quality signals that matter to readers: methodological transparency, ethical compliance, and evidence that can be reproduced or translated. These standards strengthen both author reputation and journal credibility.

Our editorial office prioritizes responsive communication. Authors receive clear instructions, structured feedback, and guidance on revisions so that each submission has the best chance to succeed on its merits.

Open access publishing extends the life of research by enabling immediate use in teaching, clinical pathways, policy planning, and future studies. This value is amplified when metadata and data availability are treated as first class outputs.

We encourage authors to think beyond a single article. Submissions that include reusable datasets, detailed protocols, or software resources tend to attract broader readership and stronger citations over time.

If you are unsure about fit, reach out early. A short abstract review can prevent misalignment and help you target the strongest journal for your work.

This page is designed to help authors and institutional partners plan publication early, reduce administrative delays, and align submissions with journal scope. Clear expectations improve review efficiency and help the editorial team deliver timely decisions.

As a senior publishing program, we focus on quality signals that matter to readers: methodological transparency, ethical compliance, and evidence that can be reproduced or translated. These standards strengthen both author reputation and journal credibility.

Our editorial office prioritizes responsive communication. Authors receive clear instructions, structured feedback, and guidance on revisions so that each submission has the best chance to succeed on its merits.

Open access publishing extends the life of research by enabling immediate use in teaching, clinical pathways, policy planning, and future studies. This value is amplified when metadata and data availability are treated as first class outputs.

We encourage authors to think beyond a single article. Submissions that include reusable datasets, detailed protocols, or software resources tend to attract broader readership and stronger citations over time.

If you are unsure about fit, reach out early. A short abstract review can prevent misalignment and help you target the strongest journal for your work.

This page is designed to help authors and institutional partners plan publication early, reduce administrative delays, and align submissions with journal scope. Clear expectations improve review efficiency and help the editorial team deliver timely decisions.

As a senior publishing program, we focus on quality signals that matter to readers: methodological transparency, ethical compliance, and evidence that can be reproduced or translated. These standards strengthen both author reputation and journal credibility.

Our editorial office prioritizes responsive communication. Authors receive clear instructions, structured feedback, and guidance on revisions so that each submission has the best chance to succeed on its merits.

Open access publishing extends the life of research by enabling immediate use in teaching, clinical pathways, policy planning, and future studies. This value is amplified when metadata and data availability are treated as first class outputs.