Tools to Support Editorial Excellence
JCD provides editors with resources to manage peer review efficiently and uphold chronic disease research standards.
Editorial Support Toolkit
Resources are designed to help editors maintain consistency, fairness, and high scientific standards.
Editors may request additional support for complex methodologies such as meta analysis, health economics, or implementation science. JCD staff coordinate specialist advice, reporting references, and safety guidance so decisions remain consistent across diverse chronic disease submissions.
- Reviewer selection and invitation guidance.
- Ethics and conflict of interest checklists.
- Decision templates for revisions and rejections.
- Reporting guideline references by study type.
Editorial Workflow
Access to submission tracking and reviewer dashboards supports timely decisions and transparency.
Quality Assurance
Guidance on methodological standards helps maintain consistent expectations across chronic disease submissions.
Integrity and Compliance
Editors use ethics resources to ensure research meets clinical and regulatory standards.
Ethics Checklists
Checklists cover informed consent, trial registration, and patient privacy requirements to reduce risk and support compliance.
Misconduct Guidance
Editors receive guidance on handling plagiarism, data concerns, and authorship disputes through clear escalation paths.
Author and Reviewer Support
Clear communication improves author experience and reviewer engagement.
- Sample decision letters for common outcomes.
- Guidance on handling conflicting reviews.
- Templates for revision requests and reminders.
- Escalation pathways for ethical concerns.
Ongoing Editorial Development
Resources support consistent editorial decision making and reviewer engagement.
- Reviewer performance tracking guidance.
- Best practices for constructive feedback.
- Updates on reporting guidelines and standards.
- Communication tips for complex cases.
These resources help editors deliver fair, timely decisions and maintain JCD quality benchmarks across chronic disease submissions.
Maintain Consistency
Editorial resources help ensure decisions are consistent across topics and study designs.
Consistency
Editors use shared standards for methodology, reporting, and ethics to reduce variation in acceptance criteria.
Timeliness
Timeline tracking tools support the 21 day decision target and help prevent reviewer delays.
- Use decision checklists for complex manuscripts.
- Document key rationale for accept and reject decisions.
- Monitor reviewer turnaround times and response rates.
- Escalate delays to the editorial office promptly.
For resource access or support, contact [email protected].
Lead Confident Editorial Decisions
Use JCD resources to ensure reliable, fair, and timely peer review. These tools help reduce reviewer fatigue and maintain high standards. Consistent use of templates shortens decision cycles and improves author satisfaction across submissions each year globally for editors everywhere.
