Editor Resources
Editors at Journal of Aging Research And Healthcare have access to guidance that supports consistent, ethical, and efficient editorial decisions.
- Assess scope fit and clinical relevance early in the review process
- Ensure ethics approvals, consent statements, and data availability are present
- Encourage reporting checklist compliance when applicable
- Maintain confidentiality and disclose conflicts of interest
- Match reviewers to the specific methods and population studied
- Avoid conflicts of interest or close collaborations
- Balance clinical and methodological expertise when possible
Editors should confirm originality screening and follow COPE guidance when concerns arise. If data integrity or image manipulation is suspected, request clarification before proceeding with a decision.
Provide clear, respectful feedback to authors and reviewers. When rejecting a manuscript, explain the primary reasons and suggest next steps when appropriate, such as language editing or resubmission to a more suitable journal. Editors may often recommend language editing when clarity is a barrier.
Document decisions with a concise rationale and note key reviewer points. Consistent documentation supports quality control and helps manage appeals.
For editorial support or questions about assignments, contact [email protected].
